Miller Starr Regalia

Should advocates of a cause be permitted on a private shopping center property in order to encourage potential customers not to patronize a store in the center? California says yes. In a case decided at the very end of 2007, Fashion Valley Mall, LLC v. N.L.R.B.,1 the California Supreme Court extended California law to the point of allowing union members to distribute leaflets on the shopping center property, encouraging customers not to patronize a large department store which advertised in the newspaper that employed the union members and with which they had an ongoing labor controversy. This decision carried California law well beyond the decision of the same court in 1979, almost 30 years earlier, in Robins v. Pruneyard Shopping Center (Pruneyard),2 when the court sanctioned the use of a San Jose shopping center by a group of students advocating a political cause. In the recent Fashion Valley Mall case, the exercise of the right of free speech was a secondary boycott directly aimed at damaging the business of the store for which the property was then in use. Both of these California Supreme Court’s decisions, almost 30 years apart, were decided by 4-3 majorities, with strong dissents.

Read the Article