<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

    <channel>
        <title>Miller Starr Regalia</title>
        <link>https://www.msrlegal.com</link>
        <description></description>
        <dc:language>en</dc:language>
        <dc:creator>msr@msrlegal.com</dc:creator>
        <dc:rights>Copyright 2026</dc:rights>
        <dc:date>2026-04-06T16:42:00+00:00</dc:date>
        <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://expressionengine.com/" />


        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[One Year After The LA Fires: Rebuilding, Recovery, And Resilience In The Midst Of A Housing Crisis]]></title>
            <link>https://www.msrlegal.com/news/one-year-after-the-la-fires-rebuilding-recovery-and-resilience-in-the-midst-of-a-housing-crisis</link>
            <guid>https://www.msrlegal.com/news/one-year-after-the-la-fires-rebuilding-recovery-and-resilience-in-the-midst-of-a-housing-crisis#When:14:54:00Z</guid>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>On January 7, 2025, a series of fires began that ripped through Southern California, leaving significant destruction in their wake.</p>]]></description>
            <dc:date>2026-03-20T14:54:00+00:00</dc:date>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Developments In Landlord-Tenant Law, A 2025 Year In Review: Courts Emphasize Contract And Statutory Adherence, While The Legislature Expands Tenant Protections]]></title>
            <link>https://www.msrlegal.com/news/developments-in-landlord-tenant-law-a-2025-year-in-review-courts-emphasize-contract-and-statutory-adherence-while-the-legislature-expands-tenant-protections</link>
            <guid>https://www.msrlegal.com/news/developments-in-landlord-tenant-law-a-2025-year-in-review-courts-emphasize-contract-and-statutory-adherence-while-the-legislature-expands-tenant-protections#When:16:00:00Z</guid>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>The year 2025 brought continued development in California landlord-tenant law on two fronts.</p>]]></description>
            <dc:date>2026-01-01T16:00:00+00:00</dc:date>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[AB 130’s Non-CEQA Housing Amendments: Bringing To Life California’s Abundance Agenda]]></title>
            <link>https://www.msrlegal.com/news/ab-130s-non-ceqa-housing-amendments-bringing-to-life-californias-abundance-agenda</link>
            <guid>https://www.msrlegal.com/news/ab-130s-non-ceqa-housing-amendments-bringing-to-life-californias-abundance-agenda#When:17:27:00Z</guid>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>On June 30, 2025, Governor Newsom signed Assembly Bill 130&nbsp;(&ldquo;AB 130&rdquo;) into law in service of California&rsquo;s &ldquo;Abundance Agenda.&rdquo;</p>]]></description>
            <dc:date>2025-11-19T17:27:00+00:00</dc:date>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Building For Abundance: The CEQA Reforms Behind AB 130 And SB 131]]></title>
            <link>https://www.msrlegal.com/news/building-for-abundance-the-ceqa-reforms-behind-ab-130-and-sb-131</link>
            <guid>https://www.msrlegal.com/news/building-for-abundance-the-ceqa-reforms-behind-ab-130-and-sb-131#When:15:53:00Z</guid>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>On June 30, 2025, Governor Newsom signed Assembly Bill 1301 (&ldquo;AB 130&rdquo;) and Senate Bill 1312 (&ldquo;SB 131&rdquo;) into law, making the most significant changes to the California Environmental Quality Act (&ldquo;CEQA&rdquo;) in decades.</p>]]></description>
            <dc:date>2025-09-05T15:53:00+00:00</dc:date>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Anti-Discrimination And Disability Rights In Real Estate: Past, Present, And Future]]></title>
            <link>https://www.msrlegal.com/news/anti-discrimination-and-disability-rights-in-real-estate-past-present-and-future</link>
            <guid>https://www.msrlegal.com/news/anti-discrimination-and-disability-rights-in-real-estate-past-present-and-future#When:15:33:00Z</guid>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>Despite decades of legislative progress, individuals with disabilities continue to face significant barriers in finding fair and accessible housing.</p>]]></description>
            <dc:date>2025-07-01T15:33:00+00:00</dc:date>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[The Federal Clean Water Act In 2025: A Retracting Construction]]></title>
            <link>https://www.msrlegal.com/news/the-federal-clean-water-act-in-2025-a-retracting-construction</link>
            <guid>https://www.msrlegal.com/news/the-federal-clean-water-act-in-2025-a-retracting-construction#When:16:38:00Z</guid>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>More than 50 years ago, the Federal Clean Water Act (CWA or Act)&nbsp;was enacted by Congress to protect the quality of the Nation&rsquo;s waters.</p>]]></description>
            <dc:date>2025-05-05T16:38:00+00:00</dc:date>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[JCCrandall, LLC V. County Of Santa Barbara: Will A Dispute Over The Use Of An Easement Send The Concept Of Legal Cannabis Cultivation Up In Smoke?]]></title>
            <link>https://www.msrlegal.com/news/jccrandall-llc-v.-county-of-santa-barbara-will-a-dispute-over-the-use-of-an-easement-send-the-concept-of-legal-cannabis-cultivation-up-in-smoke</link>
            <guid>https://www.msrlegal.com/news/jccrandall-llc-v.-county-of-santa-barbara-will-a-dispute-over-the-use-of-an-easement-send-the-concept-of-legal-cannabis-cultivation-up-in-smoke#When:19:36:00Z</guid>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>Cannabis is a multi-billion-dollar industry in California.</p>]]></description>
            <dc:date>2025-03-04T19:36:00+00:00</dc:date>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Commercial Property Owners And Sb 1103: New Consumer-Type Protections For “Qualified Commercial Tenants” In Non-Residential Leasing Transactions]]></title>
            <link>https://www.msrlegal.com/news/commercial-property-owners-and-sb-1103-new-consumer-type-protections-for-qualified-commercial-tenants-in-non-residential-leasing-transactions</link>
            <guid>https://www.msrlegal.com/news/commercial-property-owners-and-sb-1103-new-consumer-type-protections-for-qualified-commercial-tenants-in-non-residential-leasing-transactions#When:16:23:00Z</guid>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>On September 30, 2024, Governor Newsom signed into law Senate Bill 1103,&nbsp;an unprecedented legislative measure affecting non-residential landlords&rsquo; transactions with a broadly defined class of &ldquo;qualified commercial tenants.&rdquo;</p>]]></description>
            <dc:date>2025-01-02T16:23:00+00:00</dc:date>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[The Evolving Law of Waiver Under the California Arbitration Act: Predictions for a Post-Quach World ]]></title>
            <link>https://www.msrlegal.com/news/article-the-evolving-law-of-waiver-under-the-california-arbitration-act-predictions-for-a-post-quach-world</link>
            <guid>https://www.msrlegal.com/news/article-the-evolving-law-of-waiver-under-the-california-arbitration-act-predictions-for-a-post-quach-world#When:23:07:00Z</guid>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>Nearly a century ago, and recognizing the courts&rsquo; historic hostility toward arbitration agreements, Congress, followed shortly by the California Legislature, adopted laws intended to &ldquo;favor&rdquo; arbitration.</p>]]></description>
            <dc:date>2024-10-25T23:07:00+00:00</dc:date>
        </item>

        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Sheetz v. El Dorado County: Death Knell for Development Fee Programs or Harbinger of Judicial Deference?]]></title>
            <link>https://www.msrlegal.com/news/sheetz-v.-el-dorado-county-death-knell-for-development-fee-programs-or-harbinger-of-judicial-deference</link>
            <guid>https://www.msrlegal.com/news/sheetz-v.-el-dorado-county-death-knell-for-development-fee-programs-or-harbinger-of-judicial-deference#When:22:16:00Z</guid>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>The United States Supreme Court&rsquo;s most recent Takings case, Sheetz v. El Dorado County, California1 enunciated a seemingly simple holding, that legislatively-imposed development fees are not, as such, exempt from analysis under the Court&rsquo;s &ldquo;unconstitutional conditions doctrine&rdquo; under Nollan v. Cali&shy;fornia Coastal Commission2 and Dolan v. City of Tigard.3</p>]]></description>
            <dc:date>2024-09-06T22:16:00+00:00</dc:date>
        </item>

   </channel>
</rss>